Sen. Bernie Sanders was back at it, going after the likes of "welfare recipient" Walmart and arguing once again for the minimum wage to be raised in the United States. Sanders appeared on this Tuesday's The Situation Room on CNN and proceeded to make mincemeat of his fellow guest on the show, former Director of the Congressional Budget Office and McCain economic advisor, Douglas Holtz-Eakin.
July 31, 2013

Sen. Bernie Sanders was back at it, going after the likes of "welfare recipient" Walmart and arguing once again for the minimum wage to be raised in the United States. Sanders appeared on this Tuesday's The Situation Room on CNN and proceeded to make mincemeat of his fellow guest on the show, former Director of the Congressional Budget Office and McCain economic advisor, Douglas Holtz-Eakin.

Host Wolf Blitzer opened up the segment by asking Holtz-Eakin what's wrong with the recent push to see the minimum wage go up, and the best he could come up with it that it's going to hurt teenagers who are looking for work and just transfer money from the unemployed to the employed. Sanders did a very nice job of explaining why that's hogwash, that most Americans working these jobs are adults and that we should not be subsidizing these companies who are paying their CEO's millions of dollars because they refuse to pay their workers a living wage.

My guess after watching this is that Holtz-Eakin won't want to come on the air and debate Sanders on this again any time soon.

BLITZER: So will raising the minimum wage help workers?

Will it kill jobs?

Independent Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont would like to see the wage increase.

Economist and former Congressional Budget Office director, Douglas Holtz-Eakin, doesn't think it's a good idea.

Let's have a good debate right now.

And, Doug, let me begin with you.

What's wrong?

It's been four years, $7.25. Inflation has gone up. Cost of living has gone up.

What's wrong with raising the minimum wage?

DOUGLAS HOLTZ-EAKIN, FORMER DIRECTOR, CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE: It sounds great until you ask the question, where does the money come from?

And when an employer has to pay that higher minimum wage and doesn't hire somebody as a result, you basically have said let's transfer money from the unemployed to the employed. I can't favor that.

BLITZER: What about you, Senator?

I know you disagree totally.

SEN. BERNIE SANDERS (I), VERMONT: You know who the major welfare recipient in the United States of America is, Wolf?

BLITZER: All right --

SANDERS: It's Walmart. Walmart Corporation, which is owned by the Walton family, which is the wealthiest family in America, worth some $100 billion, they are paying their workers $7.25 an hour, $8.00 an hour, $9.00 an hour, without benefits.

And you know who's subsidizing Walmart?

The taxpayers of America, because many Walmart workers and their kids are on Medicaid, they're on food stamps, they're in affordable housing.

HOLTZ-EAKIN: Well, Senator --

SANDERS: It is time for employers in America to pay workers a fair wage --

HOLTZ-EAKIN: Senator --

SANDERS: -- $7.25 an hour --

HOLTZ-EAKIN: -- the question --

SANDERS: -- is not a fair wage.

HOLTZ-EAKIN: -- the question becomes, who do you think you're going to help if you raise the minimum wage?

Everyone always thinks that this is an anti-poverty tool, but you're going to give the higher minimum wage to the children of affluent people like me.

Why don't we do something that's targeted on poverty if we're worried about --

SANDERS: Wait, wait, whoa, whoa --


SANDERS: -- what are you talking about --


SANDERS: -- the children of affluent people?


SANDERS: The fact of the matter is --

HOLTZ-EAKIN: The minimum wage applies to everybody --


HOLTZ-EAKIN: -- and you know that.

SANDERS: That's right.

HOLTZ-EAKIN: So why don't --


HOLTZ-EAKIN: -- we have a -- a policy that doesn't hurt jobs?

And let's face it, it's really hurt teenagers. That raise in the minimum wage in 2008 and 2009, you had 24 percent teenage unemployment rate.



SANDERS: All right, first of all --

HOLTZ-EAKIN: Forty percent of them black African-Americans.

SANDERS: -- first of all, let's --


SANDERS: Can I get a word in here?

HOLTZ-EAKIN: Let's be realistic --


BLITZER: All right, go ahead, Senator.

SANDERS: All right, let's be real.

HOLTZ-EAKIN: Yes, let's be real.

SANDERS: And the real factor is that most people who are working for low wages are not children. That's a bogus argument. The reality is that most low-wage workers are adults. And if you want to help kids, make sure their parents are earning a decent wage.

And by the way, let me take something a step further. Most Republicans now, Wolf, we have reached such a right-wing degree that most Republicans now, they're not only opposed to raising the minimum wage, they want to abolish the minimum wage.


BLITZER: Let me ask Douglas Holtz-Eakin, do you want to abolish the minimum wage?

DOUGLAS HOLTZ-EAKIN, AMERICAN ACTION FORUM: No, but I see no reason when the national unemployment rate is 7.6 percent, teen unemployment is 24 percent. And, to pick a tool that's likely to hurt job growth doesn't target the right people. This is not targeting on poor people. (INAUDIBLE) does that. We have lots of programs that do that.

And, which in the end, it does not answer the question where does this money come from? The setup was great. It said $32 billion in additional spending. But where does that money come from?


SANDERS: First of all, let's be clear. What we are seeing now and what raising the minimum wage would do. It's not only people going from 7.25 to $10 an hour. It's people going from $9 an hour to $9 an hour. The great crisis in our country today is income inequality. Top one percent is doing well (ph). Low income workers are doing terribly well.

Now, the gentleman here talks about the need for jobs. Look, I have a proposal, others have proposals to create millions of jobs in many areas including our infrastructure, putting out people back to work. Does our friend agree with that? No, it doesn't probably.


SANDERS: Let's ask the wealthy to stop hanging their fair share of taxes, put people back to work and raise the minimum wage.

HOLTZ-EAKIN: You and I both spend time in D.C. We know that it could stand a great deal downtown. How does the minimum wage proposal that drove Wal-Mart out of building six stores took low income D.C. residents out of low prices and out of those jobs help develop the center city?

SANDERS: First of all, I don't know what Wal-Mart will end up doing, but we cannot continue to be blackmailed just because they are the wealthiest family in this country. You tell me that you think it's right that their workers, their workers are supported by taxpayers in this country in terms of Medicaid, food stamps -- paying a living wage. You think that's right?

HOLTZ-EAKIN: Are you proposing that we take people off the social state camp because they're associated with a company you don't like? Is that really your proposal?


SANDERS: I'm proposing that the wealthiest family in this country, the Walton (ph) Family, that owns Wal-Mart, not be subsidized by the middle class in this country. They've got to start paying their workers a living wage, not starvation wages, provide health care to their workers, not allow them -- not enable them to go on Medicaid. That's what I'm proposing.

HOLTZ-EAKIN: If there was another company in America that wasn't run by the wealthiest family in America, do you think it'd be a good idea for them to raise the minimum wage? Does this work anywhere else?


SANDERS: Yes. Well, I think our friends at McDonald's and Burger King can start paying a decent wage as well. Bottom line is, in America, we have to have a principle --

HOLTZ-EAKIN: Where will the money come from? Because if you actually look at the numbers, McDonald's and Burger King are not thriving. These are not huge profit margins. It's not like they're sitting on piles of cash.


HOLTZ-EAKIN: I understand that people would like to make more money. I'd love to make more money, you would. But you have to answer the practical question, where would it come from and at what cost? And it's going to hurt other low-income Americans. That's a bad idea.

SANDERS: My state of Vermont has, I believe, the third highest minimum wage in the country. It's $8.60 an hour. I want to see the national minimum wage at 10 bucks an hour. But Vermont has the third highest minimum wage in the country. You know what, we have the fourth lowest unemployment rate in this country.

So, this business that if you raise the minimum wage, all these jobs are going to disappear, historically, I don't believe that that's true and I don't believe it's true today. We have massive inequality in America, and it's time to ask the wealthy, "A," to start paying their fair share of taxes, "B," we need a massive jobs program and, "C," we need to raise the minimum wage. That's what we need to do to take -- to protect working families.

HOLTZ-EAKIN: You and I can agree on that. We need structural reforms that will actually get us that, there's no question. Throughout the better income and equality of United States is education and a decent savings system for private citizens and the minimum wage is the wrong tool for these problems.

BLITZER: A quick question and a quick answer to both of you. Doug, first to you, corporations, should they do more to help the workers who are making low-paid minimum wage? We checked. McDonald's CEO, Donald Thompson's, salary in 2012 was $13.8 million. That was the CEO of McDonald's. Is that fair, do you think?

HOLTZ-EAKIN: You know --

BLITZER: Because Bernie Sanders doesn't think it's fair.

HOLTZ-EAKIN: I'm sure he doesn't. And when you hear these big salaries, you have to ask yourself what responsibilities do they bear? And you know, if they make mistakes, what gets lost? Well, the answer is billions of jobs around the globe. And so, there is a market for those kinds of jobs.

I understand the pay looks outrageous, but I think the serious question is whether you want to continue to try to recreate the 1930s and make our corporations the vessels of the social welfare.

BLITZER: And a quick question to you, Senator, then we'll leave it. Are you willing to pay 68 cents more for your Big Mac if the minimum wage goes up if it's double?

SANDERS: We can talk about the health values of a about Big Mac on another time. But the issue is, I think, you touched on, Wolf, what you have is a CEO making $13 million a year paying starvation wages to his workers. That's unacceptable. The Wal-Mart situation is even worse. We need to make sure that nobody in this country is forced to work for starvation wages. We've got to raise the minimum wages.

BLITZER: Bernie Sanders, as usual, thanks very much. Douglas Holtz- Eakin, thanks to you as well. A good solid debate.

Can you help us out?

For 18 years we have been exposing Washington lies and untangling media deceit, but now Facebook is drowning us in an ocean of right wing lies. Please give a one-time or recurring donation, or buy a year's subscription for an ad-free experience. Thank you.


We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Any comments that are sexist or in any other way deemed hateful by our staff will be deleted and constitute grounds for a ban from posting on the site. Please refer to our Terms of Service for information on our posting policy.