Read time: 2 minutes

Times Reporter Describes Trump's Oppo Campaign Against Mueller

Sounds like the Trump team is treating this like a PR war.
Views:

On Morning Joe, Mike Barnicle asked New York Times reporter Michael Schmidt about last night's blockbuster story.

"There's a lot in this piece, but obviously the flashing red light here is the notion that the president is talking about to what extent he has to pardon his aides, his family members, and potentially himself," Barnicle said.

"Tell us more about what your reporting shows about what his attitude is towards that question. He is asking the question with what kind of disposition?"

"I think the president clearly understands the seriousness of Mueller, and he clearly gets the problem here, which is that an investigation which starts with Russia is just going to go in a lot of different directions," Schmidt said.

"What the White House is trying to do is try and find ways to stop Mueller from going beyond that, and what they do? They're researching the lawyers that Mueller has hired. They're looking at their backgrounds. They're looking at the cases that they dealt with. They're looking at whether they ever got, you know, rebuked by courts or anything. Just trying to come up with any type of information that they could use to put these to either disqualify some of these lawyers going forward or to put them on the defensive and to create problems for Mueller. They are certainly taking an aggressive posture here.

"When Ken Starr was appointed, there were folks in the Clinton world that started demonizing him for political reasons. This seems to feel along those lines and be if not more severe.

He said Trump wants to be aggressive and really go after the Mueller team, while his lawyers don't want him to do this.

"What impact are any of the lawyers that he has surrounded himself with having on the president in this regard?"

"Well, it's our sense that they don't want him to be out there," Schmidt said.

"At least, you know, some of them don't want him to be out there being so aggressive on this issue. They think that it antagonizes Mueller. It raises questions about the independence of Mueller, and it's a distraction, and it's not helpful. At the same time, this is a president that believes he is his best spokesman and has shown the willingness to attack these folks, even his own attorney general just the other day. He sees that as his best offense here.

"At the same time, it sort of raises questions about the process. He is really undermining Mueller in ways, certainly in the public's eyes, and putting the political lens on it that may not really be there."

Yeah, I'm gonna go with it "really being there."

Can you help us out?

For 17 years we have been exposing Washington lies and untangling media deceit, but now Facebook is drowning us in an ocean of right wing lies. Please give a one-time or recurring donation, or buy a year's subscription for an ad-free experience. Thank you.

More C&L Coverage

Discussion

New Commenting System

Our comments are now powered by Insticator. In order to comment you will need to create an Insticator account. The process is quick and simple. Please note that the ability to comment with a C&L site account is no longer available.

We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Any comments that are sexist or in any other way deemed hateful by our staff will be deleted and constitute grounds for a ban from posting on the site. Please refer to our Terms of Service (revised 3/17/2016) for information on our posting policy.

Please Do Not Use the Login Link at the Top of the Site.

In order to comment you must use an Insticator account. To register an account, enter your comment and click the post button. A dialog will then appear allowing you create your account.

We will be retiring our Crooks and Liars user account system in January, 2021.

Thank you.
C&L Team